Travel - Friends - Dating -- JoinMate.com!

How Many Times Has BUSH LIED ?

Bush & Al Qaeda – By The Numbers


0 – Number of meetings held by Vice President Cheney’s counterterrorism task force (which was created in May 2001)



0 – References to Al Qaeda in Dr. Rice’s 2000 Foreign Affairs article listing Bush’s top foreign affairs priorities



0 – References to Al Qaeda in Secretary Rumsfeld 2001 memo outlining national security priorities



0 – References to terrorism is Justice Department's top seven goals for 2001



0 – Number of National Security Council meetings held by Bush administration before invasion of Iraq was discussed (i.e., it was discussed at the very first meeting)



1 – Number of times the Bush administration mentioned al Qaeda prior to 9-11. This was in a notice continuing an executive order issued by President Clinton.



1 – Number of hours President Bush and Vice President Cheney agreed to allow in their joint meeting with the 9-11 panel.

2 – Number of National Security Council meetings
Facts From Fiction
STICK AROUND FOR MORE BUSH FACTS, NOT FOX NEWS FICTION

Public Comments

1. Well, it looks like you already answered you question, but I was gonna say 953 times.

2. wow, whered you get all this info?

3. too many times to count

4. wow looks like long list

he was lied to at least that many times he wilingly lied others,

5. Well, let me ask u this... How many times has he spoken? Find that out and u have tha number.

6. that was alot of information.....i'm just gonna say alot.....

7. I would say that Bush lies every time he opens his mouth.

Just to inform you: No one's going to read your novella.

8. you are not asking are you?
we shouldn't blame him for all the bad without giving him any credit for the goods. 911 didn't happen over night, it was planned before bush was elected. who was on watch before him? perhaps we all know who said something like "no sexual relationship with miss Lewinsky". yeah... it's no big deal, everybody lies....

bottom line, we want our presidents to do the right thing when he or she makes a decision.

9. Pick out the ones where Bush told us something that he knew was false, but told us it was true. Then you have to prove that his intent in doing so was to decieve us.

If you cannot do this, you cannot prove that Bush lied, about anything.

10. WOW!!!

Thats Impressive!!

11. You have too much time on your hands. If I wanted to waste that much time I can write up just as long a list on Dems. Get a life.

12. I read ALL the same information you placed in your details for this question on my own accord & I felt like no one else knew any of it, it was frusturating, but I am impressed that you took the time to find out the information that has been out there ... & educated yourself on it because you couldn't be more right!!!!

Bush has Lied countless, & an overwhelming amount of times ...that I can't keep up with his lies anymore, and beyond that find it mind boggiling that not one single person over there in D.C. or anyone for that matter hasn't stopped this ridiculous spectacle and put their foot down, and yet Americans continue to let this man run our Country ........ more or less into the ground is more like it!!

13. Nice job... on a side note:

... don't you love the conservatives that say that the people that "bash Bush" have no statistics... don't research... and don't know "the facts"... why is it that every time someone says that, they have no idea what they are talking about...

14. Wow! I wonder what the Republicans on this site must be thinking?

15. Are you sure you didn't miss a couple???? Becuase I think you may have!!! (LOL)

16. LIE NUMBER 1) Simply stated, there is no doubt that
Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.
(Dick Cheney)
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/08/20020826.html>

LIE NUMBER 2) Right NOW, Iraq is expanding and
improving facilities that were used for the production
of biological weapons. (George W. Bush)
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020912-1.html>

LIE NUMBER 3):If he declares he has none, then we will
know that Saddam Hussein is once again misleading the
world.(Ari Fleischer)
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/12/20021202-6.html>

LIE NUMBER 4):We know for a FACT that there are
weapons there.(Ari Fleischer)
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030109-8.html>

LIE NUMBER 5):Our intelligence officials estimate
that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as
much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent.
(George W.
Bush)<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030128-19.html>








LIE NUMBER 9):Intelligence gathered by this and other
governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime
continues to possess and conceal some of the most
lethal weapons ever devised. (George W. Bush, March
17,2003)<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030317-7.html>

LIE NUMBER 10):Well, there is no question that we have
evidence and information that Iraq has weapons of mass
destruction, biological and chemical particularly. . .
all this will be made clear in the course of the
operation, for whatever duration it takes.(Ari
Fleisher, March
21,2003)<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030321-9.html>

LIE NUMBER 11):There is no doubt that the regime of
Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction.
And . . . as this operation continues, those weapons
will be identified, found, along with the people who
have produced them and who guard them.( General Tommy
Franks, March 22,2003)

LIE NUMBER 12: I have no doubt we're going to find big
stores of weapons of mass destruction.(Kenneth
Adelman, March 23,2003)
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A12217-2003Mar22¬Found=true>

LIE NUMBER 13: One of our top objectives is to find
and destroy the WMD There are a number of sites. (
Victoria Clark, March 22, 2003)
<http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/t03222003_t0322osdpa.html>

LIE NUMBER 14):We know where they are. They're in the
area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south
and north somewhat.(Donald Rumsfeld, March 30,
2003)<http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/t03302003_t0330sdabcsteph.html>

LIE NUMBER 15):Obviously the administration intends to
publicize all the weapons of mass destruction U.S.
forces find -- and there will be plenty.( Neocon
Sholar, Robert Kagan, April 9,2003)
<http://www.ceip.org/files/Publications/2003-04-08-kaganpost.asp?p=11&from=pubdate>

LIE NUMBER 16):I think you have always heard, and you
continue to hear from officials, a measure of high
confidence that, indeed, the weapons of mass
destruction will be found. (Ari Fleisher,April 10,
2003)<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/04/20030410-6.html>

LIE NUMBER 17):We are learning more as we interrogate
or have discussions with Iraqi scientists and people
within the Iraqi structure, that perhaps he destroyed
some, perhaps he dispersed some. And so we will find
them.(George W. Bush, April
24,2003)<http://www.talkingproud.us/EditorChoice042603.html>

LIE NUMBER 18):There are people who in large measure
have information that we need .. . so that we can
track down the weapons of mass destruction in that
country. ( Donald Rumbsfeld, April 25, 2003)

LIE NUMBER 19): We'll find them(WMD). It'll be a matter of
time to do so. (George W. Bush, May 3, 2003)
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/05/20030503-1.html>

LIE NUMBER 20): I'm absolutely sure that there are
weapons of mass destruction there and the evidence
will be forthcoming. We're just getting it just now.(
Colin Powell, May 4, 2004)

LIE NUMBER 21): We never believed that we'd just
tumble over weapons of mass destruction in that
country.(Donald Rumsfeld, May 4, 2003)
<http://www.dod.gov/transcripts/2003/tr20030504-secdef0153.html>

LIE NUMBER 22): I'm not surprised if we begin to
uncover the weapons program of Saddam Hussein --
because he had a weapons program. =)), (George W.
Bush, May 6, 2003)
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/05/20030506-3.html>

LIE NUMBER 23): U.S. officials never expected that "we
were going to open garages and find" weapons of mass
destruction. ( Condoleeza Rice, May 12, 2003)

LIE NUMBER 24): I just don't know whether it was all
destroyed years ago -- I mean, there's no question
that there were chemical weapons years ago -- whether
they were destroyed right before the war, (or) whether
they're still hidden. (Major General David Petraeus,
May 13,2003)
<http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/tr20030513-0181.html>

LIE NUMBER 25): there's no doubt in my mind that
Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction,
biological and chemical. I expected them to be found.
I still expect them to be found. =)), (General Michael
Hagee, May 21, 2003)
<http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40B10FD345A0C718EDDAC0894DB404482>

LIE NUMBER 26): Given time, given the number of
prisoners now that we're interrogating, I'm confident
that we're going to find weapons of mass destruction.
=))=))
( General Richard Myers, May 26,2003)

8-}:-?? LIE NUMBER 27): They may have had time to destroy
them, and I don't know the answer. (Donald Dumbsfeld,
May 27, 2003)
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A51355-2003May28¬Found=true>

LIE NUMBER 28):For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on
one issue, weapons of mass destruction (as
justification for invading Iraq) because it was the
one reason everyone could agree on. ( Paul Wolfowitz,
May 28, 2003) =))
<http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/tr20030528-depsecdef0222.html>

Lying Comes Naturally to bush & the Republicans
Whenever Republican politicians find themselves in trouble, their automatic knee-jerk reaction is to blame Democrats. If there is nothing to blame Democrats for, they merely make something up - they lie. This is exactly what the Republican National Committee (RNC) chairman, following the lead of his boss George W. Bush, has done and is doing. He is placing the blame of the mean and punitive House immigration bill on the Democrats, when he knows that it is an outrageous lie.
"To be anti- George Bush is to be pro-American,"

I think he's dangerous, and he has to be stopped."

U.S. Troops Killed in Iraq Tops 2,400 <words/latestnews/index.php?id=6682>

Articles of Impeachment

of

President George W. Bush

and

Vice President Richard B. Cheney,
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice,
Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. - - ARTICLE II, SECTION 4 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales have committed violations and subversions of the Constitution of the United States of America in an attempt to carry out with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes and deprivations of the civil rights of the people of the United States and other nations, by assuming powers of an imperial executive unaccountable to law and usurping powers of the Congress, the Judiciary and those reserved to the people of the United States, by the following acts:

1) Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the rule of law; carrying out a massive assault on and occupation of Iraq, a country that was not threatening the United States, resulting in the death and maiming of over one hundred thousand Iraqis, and thousands of U.S. G.I.s.

2) Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.

3) Authorizing, ordering and condoning direct attacks on civilians, civilian facilities and locations where civilian casualties were unavoidable.

4) Instituting a secret and illegal wiretapping and spying operation against the people of the United States through the National Security Agency.

5) Threatening the independence and sovereignty of Iraq by belligerently changing its government by force and assaulting Iraq in a war of aggression.

6) Authorizing, ordering and condoning assassinations, summary executions, kidnappings, secret and other illegal detentions of individuals, torture and physical and psychological coercion of prisoners to obtain false statements concerning acts and intentions of governments and individuals and violating within the United States, and by authorizing U.S. forces and agents elsewhere, the rights of individuals under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

7) Making, ordering and condoning false statements and propaganda about the conduct of foreign governments and individuals and acts by U.S. government personnel; manipulating the media and foreign governments with false information; concealing information vital to public discussion and informed judgment concerning acts, intentions and possession, or efforts to obtain weapons of mass destruction in order to falsely create a climate of fear and destroy opposition to U.S. wars of aggression and first strike attacks.

8) Violations and subversions of the Charter of the United Nations and international law, both a part of the "Supreme Law of the land" under Article VI, paragraph 2, of the Constitution, in an attempt to commit with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes in wars and threats of aggression against Afghanistan, Iraq and others and usurping powers of the United Nations and the peoples of its nations by bribery, coercion and other corrupt acts and by rejecting treaties, committing treaty violations, and frustrating compliance with treaties in order to destroy any means by which international law and institutions can prevent, affect, or adjudicate the exercise of U.S. military and economic power against the international community.

9) Acting to strip United States citizens of their constitutional and human rights, ordering indefinite detention of citizens, without access to counsel, without charge, and without opportunity to appear before a civil judicial officer to challenge the detention, based solely on the discretionary designation by the Executive of a citizen as an "enemy combatant."

10) Ordering indefinite detention of non-citizens in the United States and elsewhere, and without charge, at the discretionary designation of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Defense.

11) Ordering and authorizing the Attorney General to override judicial orders of release of detainees under INS jurisdiction, even where the judicial officer after full hearing determines a detainee is wrongfully held by the government.

12) Authorizing secret military tribunals and summary execution of persons who are not citizens who are designated solely at the discretion of the Executive who acts as indicting official, prosecutor and as the only avenue of appellate relief.

13) Refusing to provide public disclosure of the identities and locations of persons who have been arrested, detained and imprisoned by the U.S. government in the United States, including in response to Congressional inquiry.

14) Use of secret arrests of persons within the United States and elsewhere and denial of the right to public trials.

15) Authorizing the monitoring of confidential attorney-client privileged communications by the government, even in the absence of a court order and even where an incarcerated person has not been charged with a crime.

16) Ordering and authorizing the seizure of assets of persons in the United States, prior to hearing or trial, for lawful or innocent association with any entity that at the discretionary designation of the Executive has been deemed "terrorist."

17) Engaging in criminal neglect in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, depriving thousands of people in Louisiana, Mississippi and other Gulf States of urgently needed support, causing mass suffering and unnecessary loss of life.

18) Institutionalization of racial and religious profiling and authorization of domestic spying by federal law enforcement on persons based on their engagement in noncriminal religious and political activity.

19) Refusal to provide information and records necessary and appropriate for the constitutional right of legislative oversight of executive functions.

20) Rejecting treaties protective of peace and human rights and abrogation of the obligations of the United States under, and withdrawal from, international treaties and obligations without consent of the legislative branch, and including termination of the ABM treaty between the United States and Russia, and rescission of the authorizing signature from the Treaty of Rome which served as the basis for the International Criminal Court.

17. none

18. Whenever he opens his mouth, writes a comment, expresses a political or religious position!

19. no exact figures, but i think this sums up the ugly magnitude of his bloody lies. http://reopening911.blogspot.com/

20. I never even heard him say the truth(or for him to admit to any of his mistakes such as,IRAQ)

21. 250-300
too............long

22. A better question would be, "How do you tell when Bush is lying?" That answer is simple, are his lips moving? Counting occurrences would be unattainable, unless you are starting the count from the beginning of his presidency. One Love People.

23. Wow. That is amazing! Other than the fact that you repeated yourself, asked a rhetorical question to spread your misinformed and uneducated rhetoric, had no facts to back up anything you said, stated no source for anything you said, and most the things you DID say were not anything that was even capable of being a lie and was just more of an overview of the Liberal biased media since 2000. Idiot.

24. I notice you didn't list any of your sources.
I also notice that none of your "sources" support your question that I can tell.
I do not believe we have caught Bush in any lies. We have found out that our intelligence was not as good as we had thought.
Oh wait.. what happened in the news the other day? We found weapons of mass destruction and documents discussing WMD's in Iraq.
I notice that some of your first statements mentioned that there were no mentions of Al-Queda early on.. I wonder what happened which brought them to our attention? What happened that made them such a high profile target? hmmm maybe you could help.
USS Cole? No nothing was done about that.
Bombing many American embassys. Again..nothing..
Wait.. I got it..

MAYBE IT WAS SEPTEMBER 11, 2001!!! Oh yea.. that's right.

Along your logic.. if Bush lied.. then so did: Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, President Clinton, Madelin Albright, and a bunch of others...
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 | Source

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 | Source

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 | Source

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 | Source

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 | Source

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 | Source

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 | Source

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 | Source

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002 | Source

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 | Source

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 | Source

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 | Source

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002 | Source

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002 | Source

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 | Source

Here's an idea. Stop blaming Bush for everything! Try blaming all the people that are responsible. We can take that walk clear back to Carter if i'm not mistaken.
Bill Clinton had three chances to take out Bin Laden, but did nothing.

Stop sucking up everything that Al Franken, Michael Moore, and CNN spit out as fact.

By the way it's obvious you weren't looking for an answer. You were merely looking for an outlet to disseminate (look it up) your drive-by media soundbytes.

25. "Hate" is a powerful word...

And...

Bush cut budgets from programs such as medicaid, food stamps, farm subsidies, agency budgets (such as from the Pentagon), and student loan programs.

He also raised premiums to employers for government insurance of their employees' and retirees' pension benefits and fees on students who default on loans or consolidate them and higher fees on parents who borrow on behalf of their college-age children.

California Rep. George Miller (news, bio, voting record), the senior Democrat on the panel, called the package a "raid on student aid."

Bush also cut budgets from child support enforcement.

Bush tightened eligibility standards for foster care assistance in nine states and delay some lump-sum payments to very poor and elderly beneficiaries of Social Security's Supplemental Security Income program.

Bush also eliminated payments to industries harmed by unfair foreign trade practices.

"They are targeting programs for poor people to pay for tax cuts for rich people," said Rep. David Obey (news, bio, voting record), D-Wis. Once those tax cuts are passed, Obey added, deficits will be increasing again.

On the student loan information sheet, the maximum amount a first-year college student could receive as a loan from the government is $2625 or somewhere in that proximity. That amount will cover less than 1/5 of college expenses for a university with annual expenses (everything including books, tuition, room & board, etc.) of $14,000.00. I know because I will be a first-year college student and I already feel the pressure.

So...

Do I like Bush? Not really; I hate him; I hate him; I hate him; I hate him; I hate him; I hate him; I hate him. "Hate" is, indeed, a powerful word, much more powerful than "dislike," but it is so often used it is sometimes meaningless. I hate every f%^#*@$ thing Bush has done in office. Add one more word to "hate" and it has a whole new meaning. And I do hate every f%^#*@$ thing Bush has done in office. He said he'd make America a better place, which was a fat a$$ lie. Just look at all the budget cuts to programs that aid the middle and lower class, which America mostly consist of. He's a liar, he's making America a worse country.

26. geez you need to spend less time hating and more time contemplating why he "lied" cause you accept all of these as facts without a lot of backup/ dilligent research. if any were really true congress the democrats would have impeached long ago for retalliation for impeachemnt of Swell Old Bill

get a grip on reality...quick before it escapes you

27. I did not bother reading ....make it short and simple. AND what President hasn't??????????????????????????????????

28. How many times have you lied? (countless, evidently!)

Those aren't lies just from Bush, but his whole campain.

29. 999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,9999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,9999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999 times

30. Every time his lips have moved!

31. THE SAME # OF TIMES HIS MOUTH OPENS FOR AIR EACH DAY.

32. Excuse me but is the motto of the Democrat this fall going to be "Vote for me. I'm not a Republican"? Well here's a clue for you. This fall the races are at most going to be state wide. And local elections are based more on how voters in a limited area see their representatives. Not on how they see the President.

The Republicans took Congress away from Democrats by offering something that resonated with the public. It was called 'Contract with America'. What it wasn't was contract with Republicans, Democrats, or special interest groups. Their contract whether or not they meant it included everyone. The Democrats can do the same thing.

Is the next Democratic Presidential candidate going to run on "Vote for me. I'm not George W Bush". The Republican Presidential Candidate can say the same thing. And you can't say he's lying. Here's a prophecy of the future. Bush will be gone after January 2009. No matter who wins George W Bush will not be the President.

I can't tell you how you can get back to where you once were Democrats. I can only do what Democrats of today seem to be able to do. I can tell you what you are doing is all wrong. And I just did.
And here's some more stuff for you to note. During his time in office Bill Clinton never passed a single balanced budget. He signed a couple. But he never passed a single one. Congress did.

Democrats lost control of Congress because Conservative Democrats quit voting for the Democratic Candidates.

Then Democrats lost the White House for the same reason.

You can say Republicans cheated all you want to. But outside of the hard line left in the Democratic party no one believes them. There are people who are conservatives who are Democrats and conservative. Those Conservatives still call themselves Democrats and still vote Democrat on state races. Because they can vote for a CONSERVATIVE Democrat at that level. And they couldn't vote for a CONSERVATIVE Democrat at the national level. So they sat at home OR voted for a Republican.

My complements on your ability to cut and paste. But here is not the time or the place for your doctoral dissertation. Republicans will just say it's all a lie. Democrats can't maintain their attention that long. And those in the middle of the road (like me) just get tired of your ranting and raving.

33. Boy have the spin doctors had a good time with you.

34. Every time he opens his mouth.

35. He's lied since he was born. He's actually a girl.

36. Wow. Hard to top that. Good job. I have nothing I can add to that.

37. wow thats a lot of info. I didn't read much of it, because bush pretty much lies about each question he's asked by the press.

38. I am sure you missed some. Bush has been a very busy boy. I say every time he moves his lips his nose grows.

Did you get the pretzel incident?

39. bush never lied you dick

oh and your question is wayyyy toooo long

40. ok. well, i do hate bush's freaking guts, and i think it was really cool for you to take the time to do all this research about something you care about, but why just sit here complaining? why not do something about it? i swear, if u have this much time on your hads why not go portest or soemthing. do something USEFUL!

41. I like Beer!!!!!!!!!

42. Ur Q is so long!
Yes he lies all the time

43. Okay, first off, if you want to open a blog then skip on over to 360.yahoo.com and rant away.

As for the supposed "lies" let's look a bit further at that.

Clintons administration was claiming that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction since 1988 but of course a gerbil brained idjit such as yourself will never allow something as irrelevant as that facts to undermine their campaign for stupidity.

Put the blame where it belong, squarely on the head of Saddam.

He signed the cease-fire and later ignored it.

He kicked the weapons inspectors out.

He had a history of seeking and using weapons of mass destruction.

"Saddam’s super-cannon of pre-Gulf War fame is making a comeback. In its newly adapted form, the fabled monster gun is designed to fire nuclear, chemical and biological shells at US military targets in the Gulf, Middle East, Red Sea and Mediterranean, as well as targeting Kuwait, Bahrain, Turkey and Israel. This was revealed by DEBKA-Net-Weekly in its last week’s issue."

Also, remember reading about Halabjah?

Fact is that we went on the best information that we had and perhaps, just perhaps, had Clinton actually acted like a President and not a Frat house hornball then perhaps Saddam would not have though that the US was too weak to act.

8 major terrorist attacks on US soil in all eight years of Clinton's reign of stupidity and no one bats an eyelash.

The WTC comes down a few months after Bush is sworn into office and he's the village idiot.

You morons needs to seriously re-evaluate your perception of reality.

What also nauseates me is how the lefties always seem to live in perpetual hindsight. Take this gem as an example.

"Failing To Go After A Cornered Bin Laden The " Gravest Error" in the War on Terror. "The Bush administration has concluded that Osama bin Laden was present during the battle for Tora Bora late last year and that failure to commit U.S. ground troops to hunt him was its gravest error in the war against al Qaeda, according to civilian and military officials with first-hand knowledge.""

Did we know he was there at the time? Obviously not! Had we known then I'm pretty sure we would have gone after him.

Christ! I need a drink now!

44. Looks like you covered most of them pretty well, but the beat goes on. Bush-t can't seem to open his mouth with out telling another lie. That's what happens with most liars. More and more cover-ups.
He is too ignorant to make up those explanations. His mouth- pieces do that for him. He was just a good ole boy, silver boot in his mouth, rip-SNORTING, cheerleading rah rah boy, former drunk, born again pip squeak. Took smart people to build him 2 campaigns and lots of stupid people to elect him.
He lies and lies!

45. i want to believe i have more serious things to do.

46. Bush has lied so many times that I have stopped counting.

47. My answer is fewer times than Clinton had sex in office. Plus we had only one terrorist attach on American soil since he was in office. If I am not mistaken, Clinton had three bombings take place on American soil, the first was the World Trade Center, next was Oklahoma City and finally the Atlanta Olympics. He did not a thing until he was caught lying to a Grand Jury and then he struck an aspirin factory. Bin Laden's family is the King of Saudi Arabia, he is an outcast of that family, get your facts straight.

48. You know, I'm glad you took the time to write this. That means your were off the street for several hours, which frankly, I'd prefer. Please write more. Much more.

OH, by the way. Clinton was the first person to perform Military strikes on Post gulf war Iraq. Clinton was the first to identify WMD in Iraq. Clinton was the one who failed to act after the first WTC attack. Clinton was the one who lied under oath to a congressional hearing.

I'd say more, but I have a life. Please, write another novel. I'm going out tonight, and I'd feel safer if a nutball like you were home, at your beloved computer.

49. so why did you vote for him?

50. GW may have been the mouthpiece, but I seriously doubt we can honestly put the blame on him. Anybody who can't think to talk for himself couldn't possibly have done all that. In fact he probably ought to go back to Texas and take another vacation and let Cheney and the boys take over, at least then we could blame the right people instead of a puppet.